The daily assault on truth, and on the free press, is extreme but hardly without precedent.  Dismayed by a letter falsely asserting that “Islam was already banned in America” under a 1952 law, I wrote a rejoinder that the New Haven Register published this week.

Linda Qiu of the New York Times listed “12 inaccurate claims” from the U.S. president at a single Iowa rally.

The News Literacy Project is concerned with the kind of issues that the Stanford History Education Group has exposed and likewise aims to address.

Kevin Levin, in the Smithsonian, recognizes the importance of history teachers as “the remedy for the spread of fake news.”  He writes, “There is no denying that access to primary sources from the Library of Congress and other research institutions, along with secondary sources from the scholarly community, has enriched the teaching of history, but their availability means little if they cannot be accessed or distinguished from the vast amount of misinformation that awaits the uneducated user online.... The history classroom is an ideal place in which to teach students how to search and evaluate online information given the emphasis that is already placed on the careful reading and analysis of historical documents. Even the most basic guidelines can steer students away from misinformation.... Healthy and well-deserved skepticism can go a long way.  The ease with which we can access and contribute to the web makes it possible for everyone to be his or her own historian, which is both a blessing and a curse. The internet is both a goldmine of information as well as a minefield of misinformation and distortion. Teaching our students how to discern the difference will not only help them steer clear of fake history and fake news, but reinforce the importance of a responsible and informed citizenry. In doing so, we strengthen the very pillars of democracy.”

Here are three sources of historical context: 

   James W. Cortada, at the Oxford University Press blog;

   Jacob Soll, at Politico Magazine; and

   Richard D. Brown (my father), via the Yale University Press blog.  His previous books include Knowledge Is Power: The Diffusion of Information in Early America, 1700–1865 and The Strength of a People: The Idea of an Informed Citizenry in America, 1650-1870.  His most recent book is Self-Evident Truths: Contesting Equal Rights from the Revolution to the Civil War.

As the June 12 fiftieth anniversary of the Loving v. Virginia decision approaches, I published a piece at Medium that adapts earlier reflections at This I Believe.

Among the updated observations are references to law professor Sheryll Cashin, who has written a new book called Loving: Interracial Intimacy in America and the Threat to White Supremacy, and to the anthology Mixed, a collection of short stories that Chandra Prasad edited.

Amid concerns about humans’ effect on the global climate – and about the Trump administration’s intention to withdraw from the Paris accord despite many U.S. companies’, states’, and cities’ efforts to the contrary – there is some encouraging news from India.  As China is gradually reducing its reliance on coal (and investing heavily in solar technology in a way that could allow it to outcompete the U.S. for many future jobs), India also is seeing the environmental and economic benefits of renewable sources such as solar; its price has fallen rapidly.